Literature Review · 2022

Post-COVID rehabilitation and multiorgan effects: a review

О. Ш. Ойноткинова, С. Т. Мацкеплишвили, В. Н. Ларина, Н. Л. Камынина, Е. А. Каравашкина, М. А. Рамок, А. А. Рыжих, Т. А. Пономарев, А. И. Бикбаева, А. С. Дементьева
Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия · 2022 · 15(2):202–214

Post-COVID rehabilitation requires attention to respiratory, cardiovascular, nervous-system and other consequences of infection. This 2022 review discusses multiorgan involvement and several recovery approaches. Hypoxic and hypoxia–hyperoxia interventions form one part of the discussion, not a single established solution for every post-COVID problem.

What the review discusses

The authors consider vascular and endothelial processes, inflammation, microcirculation and mitochondrial function. They relate these mechanisms to the variety of symptoms and organ systems described after COVID-19. These explanations reflect the publication's scientific context and should not all be presented as settled causes in every individual patient.

Post-COVID rehabilitation: individual context

Different symptom patterns and initial health states can require different rehabilitation priorities. A programme for reduced exercise tolerance is not automatically appropriate for every form of persistent symptoms. The review's broad approach supports defining the person's clinical problem before attributing benefit to one proposed intervention.

Where hypoxic approaches appear

One section considers hypoxic training and hypoxia–hyperoxia alongside other approaches. The review itself does not recruit a new OXYTERRA patient cohort. Referencing a prior study also does not provide an independent replication of that study's findings or establish effectiveness across all post-COVID presentations.

Why publication date matters

The article reflects discussion in 2022. Its medication and rehabilitation descriptions are the authors' account, not an individual prescription or proof that every approach remains appropriate. The original text is useful for understanding how the research questions developed, while patient care requires current clinical assessment.

Conclusion

The review's main contribution is a multiorgan perspective and an argument for individualised rehabilitation. It does not establish hypoxic training as a universal post-COVID treatment. The original publication provides the detailed mechanisms, proposed approaches and references behind the authors' discussion.

Context and further reading

Applications presents supervised recovery contexts, and technology explains oxygen alternation. Product information concerns OXYTERRA RS equipment and should not be mistaken for proof of every approach discussed in this review.

Read the journal publication

Original publication

Влияние SARS-CoV-2 на мультиорганное поражение и реабилитационная тактика в постковидном периоде
О. Ш. Ойноткинова, С. Т. Мацкеплишвили, В. Н. Ларина, Н. Л. Камынина, Е. А. Каравашкина, М. А. Рамок, А. А. Рыжих, Т. А. Пономарев, А. И. Бикбаева, А. С. Дементьева. Влияние SARS-CoV-2 на мультиорганное поражение и реабилитационная тактика в постковидном периоде. Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия · 2022 · 15(2):202–214. DOI: 10.17116/kardio202215021202.
An English editorial account prepared for OXYTERRA-MED from the supplied publication. This is not a complete or certified translation: methods, selected results and interpretation are presented in a concise form. The original PDF contains the full text, tables, figures and bibliography. Publication is based on permissions supplied by the rights holder.

For professional reference. This material is not medical advice.

Get scientific materials

A selection of publications and materials for professionals.